レビュー募集中！Kong Gatewayを紹介・競合製品の評判をユーザーレビュー・口コミで紹介

What do you dislike about the product?

Limited GUI Interface: Kong primarily relies on a RESTful API for configuration. While there are community-contributed UIs, the official graphical user interface (GUI) may not be as feature-rich.

What do you like best about the product?

Kong's rich plugin ecosystem is often highlighted as a major strength. It offers a wide range of plugins for authentication, rate limiting, logging, security, transformations, and more. This flexibility allows you to customize and extend the functionality of your API gateway according to your specific needs.

Scalability: Kong is designed to be highly scalable, making it suitable for handling a large volume of API traffic. Its architecture supports horizontal scaling, enabling you to distribute the load across multiple instances.

What do you dislike about the product?

While Kong API Gateway is robust, there are occasional complexities in the implementation process, demanding a steeper learning curve. Moreover, the support documentation could be more comprehensive

What do you like best about the product?

Kong API Gateway excels in its user-friendly interface, making API management a seamless process. Its extensive features, from traffic control to security measures, are highly advantageous.

What do you dislike about the product?

Troubleshooting issues with the Kong API can be quite difficult, but offering more descriptive error messages will greatly enhance the process and deliver substantial advantages for users of this software.

What do you like best about the product?

I am thoroughly impresse­d with the commitment to security de­monstrated by Kong API Gateway. Additionally, its ability to scale on-de­mand and the wide range of plugins it offe­rs, along with their ease of inte­gration, have greatly optimized our API manage­ment tasks.

What do you dislike about the product?

The thing I dislike about Kong API Gateway is predicated on external services, consisting of databases, caching systems, and load balancers. If any of those dependencies revel in troubles or downtime, it may impact the availability and functionality of the gateway.

What do you like best about the product?

The great aspect approximately Kong API Gateway which I like is its robust and characteristic-rich nature. It presents a centralized platform for handling APIs and microservices. Apart from it Kong API gives diverse protection features to protect your APIs and make sure the security and integrity of your API surroundings.

What do you dislike about the product?

The part that I don't like of Kong API gateway is we need more Integration with Kubernetes. Need more Medium post on Kong API gateways. Some times issue with connection it's get refused sometimes

What do you like best about the product?

The first thing of Kong API that ilI like the Most is it's popularity among the World. Can be used in both Hybrid and Multi cloud, it's well optimised for Microservices. It supports Load Balancing of API that's what the most I like of it. We can do clustering, checking health, monitoring few more things. It can even run in Kubernetes. It's Open Source the most Important thing.

What do you dislike about the product?

Not all plugins are free plus it lack to do complex taks like which can be done by IBM API connect or Apigee

What do you like best about the product?

Kong is easy to use, setup and simple API gateway which can provide proxies to your microservice architecture. It can provide extra features using plugins.

What do you dislike about the product?

While evaluating Kong Gateway, I observed that certain features, such as the built-in management and developer portals, may not be as robust as alternative solutions. However, I was particularly impressed by the strength of the configuration management tools provided by Kong. These tools enabled efficient and effective management of configurations, enhancing the overall functionality of the API gateway.

What do you like best about the product?

During my recent project involving API gateway implementation, I had the opportunity to explore and utilize the various deployment options provided by Kong Gateway. I found these options to be thoroughly documented and well-supported by Kong. Throughout the implementation process, I received excellent support from the Kong team, which greatly contributed to the success of the project.

What do you dislike about the product?

Documentation would be better if it contained detailed steps for configuring Postgres.
Also, datastore support is limited to Postgres; it will be better to support other DB like MySQL.

What do you like best about the product?

Kong API gateway has a simple manager GUI that facilitates the configuration; it is easy to get started fast using this GUI. Also, plugin support and modularity are big advantages of Kong.

What do you dislike about the product?

Creating Custom Plugins using lua ,
forces to learn new technology,
Although kong has flexibility to integrate with GO and JS ,
Still I feel the performance is not similar

What do you like best about the product?

Easy to configure services and routes and plugins in kong and several security plugins makes development handy.
Different flavours of deployment with kong like CP DP Model , Kong mesh and Kong Konnect and standalone on prem deployment.
Lightening fast routing traffic and plugin execution makes it best in performance.
Several policies with kong mesh makes the development handy.
Easy to integrate with the microservices and easy to implement custom plguins .