Microsoft Visual Studio Team Foundation Server 2015の評判・口コミ 全5件

What do you dislike?

For the use that I personally do, I have not found specific minus points,

Rarely it is happened that due to a visual studio crash during the check-in of a project, my changes was lost but I'm not sure that the problem due to Team Foundation Server ...

What do you like best?

I find the TFS (microsoft code versioning) much more user-friendly against his competitors.

Installation requires a little bit of time, in our case we used an "ad-hoc" server that deals only with this but it can be installed on any server that is accessible from several clients that need to use the versioning of code.

We use it only for the projects Visual Studio (mainly on the Integration Services package) the History of versioning is easily queryable and switch from one version to another does not require any time.

Recommendations to others considering the product

If you are starting to use it, it is free with TFS Express ( only for 5 members of the team,)

You can works with different language including Java, Python, HTML5, JavaScript, C # ecc..

What do you dislike?

It is expensive and works well with Microsoft stack but not well with other languages.

What do you like best?

A versioning system along with estimation tool makes it a one stop tool for both developers and project managers

Recommendations to others considering the product

It is expensive and works best with the Microsoft stack

What do you dislike?

sometimes it's a little bit slow working with this tools, and when you havn't connection with the server, you can have a lot of error messages. a little bit frustrating, it can be a little bit smarter to handle some problems. However, there aren't any other big issue about that product. I don't know if it works well on platform different from microsoft windows.

What do you like best?

i would like to recommend Microsoft Team Foundation Server because of his integration with Visual Studio, and because it's quite easy to use and to do projects with this tool. It's smart and there are not a lot of functions, so it's easy to understand.

The online portal and management reporting tools are also quite simple to use but they're also powerful.

Recommendations to others considering the product

consider using microsoft team foundation express, that It窶冱 free and can upgrade to TFS professional in a bit.

What do you dislike?

There are no good options for using TFS on a Mac OS X . Yes, i know about Eclipse plugin, but that one is crap, to be honest.

What do you like best?

UI in Visual studio works really well. With the new 2013 TFS, the web interface is significantly improved.It is now almost as good as github.

Recommendations to others considering the product

An excellent option if you are considering to base your work on Microsoft stack (.net and sql). otherwise, consider enterprise github

What do you dislike?

When many connections iccurred on, it overhauls itself and permission checking for access control among users makes hard to change the status of items.

What do you like best?

It is easy to use for managing customer requests and giving fast response through comments on open issues. It also has built-in scrum dashboards and history graphics for requests.

Recommendations to others considering the product

It is a good choice for teams who wants to manage requests and bugs through a dashboard, also for agile development it makes tracking easy.

What do you dislike?

Sometimes I don't have the right permissions within TFS to do the things I need/want to do, and I have to bother the VP of technology for access.

What do you like best?

I love TFS. I love the way it tracks bugs, I love the way it manages and tracks deployments to different environments, and I love the way it manages test cases, test plans, requirements, and features, as well as tasks. Our company currently has it set up so that I can access TFS remotely via the web and it has been incredibly useful. The development team also set up a button that allows QA resources to push deployments from our test to our QA environments, which has freed up our development resources considerably.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Ensure you have a system in plan if you plan to use a different product (like JIRA) for client facing issue reporting. JIRA for example has addons that will integrate with TFS and automatically create issues from JIRA into TFS.

What do you dislike?

Horrible search. Difficult to "quickly" find anything. In choosing this product as a business solution, you will find it difficult to get less technically inclined individuals to be able to manage tasks using this 1990's drill down interface. PBIs or Product Backlog Items cannot be viewed in any other view except as an unordered list. Terrible. What's worse is that if you want to see PBIs on a board view or card column view you must first duplicate the entire PBI in the form of a task this splinters documentation all over the place. Sprint management results in writing down a lot of info on paper on your desk so that you can hopefully remember how to find it the next time. User's of all calibre fail to document progress of tasks etc using this system because it's organized so poorly it will make your head explode.

What do you like best?

Team Foundation Server is practically counterproductive, there is nothing I like best about this system. There are several softwares that beat Team Foundation Server and are either free or cost way less. As a software engineer with over 10 years of experience and having used multiple ticket tracking, SCM, and automation softwares, this one is absolutely the worst of the worst.

Recommendations to others considering the product

*** DO NOT USE TEAM FOUNDATION SERVER *** This software is usually throw in with other microsoft licensing packages etc to force people to use it or to keep on using it. It constantly wastes everyone's time when they are unable to simply keep track of tasks ( the main purpose of this software ). Product Backlog Items are unable to be tracked on a visual board without having to duplicate them in the form of tasks. This results in splintered documentation and tracking of tasks. Users end up with a lot of confusion with simple tasks and become poorly organized.

What do you dislike?

The permissions required in server. the server should be accessed by anyone but some should have rights and for that permissions should be asked.

What do you like best?

The microsoft team foundation server is a good one to deliver source control and work item tracking. The best part is the server includes a data warehouse.

What do you dislike?

Search feature should be easy to use and it is not preferred for mac OS X.

What do you like best?

I find Microsoft Team Foundation Server very useful when planning resources and feature deployments. It gives all the thing you need to manage development : bug tracking, integration, UI in visual studio works well.