レビュー募集中！Azure Load Balancerを紹介・競合製品の評判をユーザーレビュー・口コミで紹介

What do you dislike about the product?

Everything is done in the cloud and I gues thats whats makes it a more robust system.

What do you like best about the product?

It's scalable, secure and almost zero data loss due to distributed network of data farms that helps to maintain data integrity.

What do you dislike about the product?

All of the communications from a single cloud service will come from the same public IP address. This means that all of the clients will share the same 64 K connection limit that is imposed by TCP. This limit is applied to connections from the same source port and source IP address to the same destination port and destination IP address.

What do you like best about the product?

Microsoft Azure Networking Azure Load Balancer. Internet Facing Load Balancer :- Load Balancer passes public IP request to Virtual Machine. Internal Facing Load Balancer :- Traffic within the Virtual Network is passed through the Load Balancer.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Load Balancer passes public IP request to Virtual Machine. Virtual Machine’s response is routed back to client through the Load Balancer, onto the public IP.

What do you dislike about the product?

this configuration documents are not clear so hard to understand the concept when we try to configure the system.

What do you like best about the product?

it easily manage and share web site traffic with multiple server so it protects the website from the denial of service.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

You must have knowledge of azure and networks in order to have the best service performance.

What do you dislike about the product?

The peering should be done over IP Sec tunnels not native peering.
The feature set on the far side basic load equalization is proscribed.
Yet the pricing model is bit huge.

What do you like best about the product?

Azure Load Balancer permits us to allocate the load across multiple servers. The simplest half is it's the choice of each free and customary option. however it's a decent choice to begin with Free version though it has restricted practicality and for our case it absolutely quite enough. for a beginner its best to proceed with the free version.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Go for the free version first to learn and proceed with balancing concept.

What do you dislike about the product?

Documentation is not clear enough and configures health probes base on backend service in the portal is confusing

What do you like best about the product?

Load Balancer is simple to create and well integrate with other Azure resources such as Scale Set, Web App and it provides almost feature we need with layer 4 Load balancer: Destination selection, Port forwarding, Automatic reconfiguration, Health probes...
We could use the Basic SKU for free and it has all the features we need for small or medium applications

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Use this Basic Sku unless you have special requirement, it only works in layer 4 so if you need other feature such as HTTP header or client certificate you need to use Application Gateway

What do you dislike about the product?

Having fully tested and deployed several Azure load balancers we are not seeing anything to dislike about the product.

What do you like best about the product?

The best part is that the Azure load balancer is able to automatically add resources to the pool when scaling up or down.

What do you dislike about the product?

The inability to add an existing VM to an availability set

What do you like best about the product?

I liked the simplicity of adding your VMS to availability sets then being able to easily target and set health probes and rules to the selected VM's

What do you dislike about the product?

You are unable to access ALB endpoints from other vnets peered. The peering must be done over (more expensive) IPSec tunnels not native peering. The feature set beyond basic load balancing is limited, Session stickyness is very basic and load balancing rules don't allow custom patterns.

What do you like best about the product?

Azure Load Balancer is fairly easy to set up, We use it to provide front-ends for our SQL servers. Once it's set up, it works as advertised.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Make sure you understand the limitations of ALB around vnet peering.

What do you dislike about the product?

At this point and the amount of testing we have done I dont see any specific drawback. As I mentioned we have tested with free option which server our need

What do you like best about the product?

Azure Load Balancer allows us to distribute the load across multiple servers. The best part is it has the option of both free and standard option. Though Free version has limited functionality but it is a good option to start with and for our case it was more than enough.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

If you are planning to move the resources to the cloud and want to make sure the applications are high;y available and you are able to distribute the load easily ALB is a great option !!!