BricsCAD Proの評判・口コミ 全22件

What do you dislike?

It is nothing I dislike, but it would be nice if BricsCAD would run as smoothly on Linux as it does on Windows. However, I am aware the bottleneck is the Linux graphic driver and there is probably little Bricsys can do about this.

What do you like best?

Two things actually: First, I can use my existing DWG-files from many years ago with no hassle. Second I can do Mechanical and BIM with the same CAD software.
The interface is familiar (although I haven't worked with AutoCAD for two years now) and I can use the command line for the most frequently used functions, the Quad (I am still discovering what else I can do with the Quad) or the ribbon, depending on the situation.

What do you dislike?

There are a few things that could use some changes. The snapshot function produces a specialized file format. The "Start" screen is not easily configurable. Mostly minor complaints.

What do you like best?

I like a lot of features of Brics CAD. Some of the most notable features are, works well in Windows and dosn't freeze up. Similiarity to ACAD helps. The cost. Imports and exports well. Works in DWG format. Highly Configurable. ETC !

Recommendations to others considering the product:

BricsCAD is not the perfect solution, no software is. At least with BricsCAD and a little effort, it is possible to achieve your CAD goals. If you are coming from ACAD and expect the software to do all the work, go back to ACAD. If you don't mind a few different Icons and Functions then check it out!

What do you dislike?

It crashes a lot on Mac, way more than AutoCAD. But the most annoying and debilitating bug is the one where the cursor flickers and moves when picking grips, in a way that mimics some kind of neurological-driven physical shaking condition. Imagine that whenever you go to grab something with your fingers, your hand begins to shake uncontrollably. That's what picking grips with Bricscad on a Mac is like.

What do you like best?

It works well as an inexpensive AutoCAD substitue. I like the fact that AutoLisp works with it, so most of my custom tools work. I like to write my own algorithms for various tasks, so the programming interface is nice. I would like to try Python in Bricscad, being that its a better language than Lisp.

What do you dislike?

Only minor, it's not fully there on the Mac OS - yet:
Dragging grips is buggy, and there's no mouse-over menu on them.
You can't print, you have to print to pdf then print, so the drawing also loses the print settings if you do go back to other software without this limitation.
You can't stack things like the layer and properties pane so waste screen space
Don't try and enlarge the cross-hair

What do you like best?

I can use all the text commands I've been using for the last 25 years
I can afford to upgrade to full BIM, previously nowhere near affordable
It looks like there's much greater appetite for further development, not just UI tinkering
It handles point clouds better

What do you dislike?

It took me a little while to navigate and figure out the Options menu, but once those settings were mastered, the look and feel of the program and its stability inspired confidence.

What do you like best?

I was forced to finally upgrade my Windows OS to 10, rendering my suite of legacy software obsolete. The interface is almost identical, and I previously relied on macros which are identical with Brics.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Try it for yourself

What do you dislike?

Even with a good customer service, some issues are, in the end, set as "will be solved with future updates", and there is no feedback on it if it happens. Would be nice to know it!

What do you like best?

The software is very easy to understand if you know the basics of Autocad and for any trouble of question the customer service is very fast and responsive. The software is not particularly heavy for the PC.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

Like Autocad, less expensive, with good customer support and not as heavy as the original one.

What do you dislike?

The only real problem I had was with the program crashing when I tried to open a block when editing a drawing through a viewport; this has since been fixed. The only frustration I have now is having to go back to AutoCAD to design land development projects, and that's only a problem with BricsCAD being too user-friendly.

What do you like best?

The program functions exactly like AutoCAD, but the layout of many of the settings dialogs is much more logical (organized outline format in Brics vs random "stream of consciousness" in AutoCAD). BricsCAD also seems to be more stable (far fewer crashes) than AutoCAD. In my experience, the drawings have been entirely compatible when going back and forth between AutoCAD and BricsCAD. Best of all, a perpetual license is about a quarter the cost of a yearly subscription to AutoCAD.

What do you dislike?

Not so much a dislike as a feature wish, I'd love to have easily selected native support for Libre Office products to handle OLE objects such as bills of materials in spreadsheet form.

What do you like best?

My main reason for trying BricsCAD was the software I previously used to work from home discontinued support for Linux. I was pleasantly surprised to find that BricsCAD Pro is a full-featured 2d & 3d design tool that still offers perpetual licensing as well as subscription-based options. For my needs of working from home & designing items to be 3d printed it's superior to my previous CAD software which was 2d only. Of course, BricsCAD is much more expensive than Draftsight but still far less than Autocad.

Recommendations to others considering the product:

If you are a current user of Autocad or a similar product using .dwg files you'll be able to jump right in and work with BricsCAD easily for 2d drafting & design. In a Windows environment with Office installed it handles all OLE files with ease. The Communicator add-in allows you to import and export a huge variety of different cad formats for viewing and editing. The pricing is reasonable and the time I had to use the customer support system was great. Well worth the money.