Hyper-Vの評判・口コミ 全104件

What do you dislike?

Not much at all I would say, I really love how it is, maybe need some improve about how export from vmdk to vhd ( or I need a bit more of training) to make processes works better, but to be honest there's nothing that I really hate significantly.

What do you like best?

I really like how it share resources, how a single hardware can split to several systems and get small systems doing small tasks without overwhelm a single system, works great as for small environments like larger ones, always keeping track of resources, performance, etc. And pretty simple.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Not many, just improve migration processes and snapshots proccesses which tend to fill up the drives.

What do you dislike?

To host one or two virtual servers in a small environment. This software will do the job but on larger infrastructures this isn't the ideal solution. The management of the resources is a lot more work to manage compared to the other vendors. Limited administration on the virtual machine side.

What do you like best?

I like that Hyper V comes included with Windows 2012 R2. I find that out of all the virtualization software out in the market. This one is probably the easiest to use. You don't need to be an expect to set up or create a virtual machine. The amount of online content on how to use and set up virtual machine is a huge plus. The biggest plus about this virtualization software is the cost. Its free and included with Microsoft 2012 R2

Recommendations to others considering the product

If your company is looking to virtualize and not have any up front cost and you already have Windows 2012 R2 you can implement without any additional cost. Maybe just additional hardware to support the VM's

What do you dislike?

Perfect solution for small to medium size business right now, but not as feature rich as vSphere.

What do you like best?

If you're a Microsoft shop this product is solid, dependable and plugs into Azure quite easily. The price point on this product compared with other virtualization technologies is also much better.

In terms of usability, this product is intuitive, easy to use and is a great way to manage your organization's VMs.

What do you dislike?

Management can be a tricky thing. the MMC console is hard to get going with if you are not on the same domain or work group as the server. It is generally not great to to bind the hyper visor to a domain in a small environment because the host would need resources from a guest to function. Features are less then what VMware offers but it has the essentials. It also has less support from 3rd party appliances which are ported to VMware first and hyper v later.

What do you like best?

It is fairly easy to setup and install. Running windows gives it great integration with Active Directory and power shell. It also allows you to run anti virus on it too. The live storage migration and better networking are good. Love that it can be installed on a server core to reduce footprint and resources. Also the licensing for hyper v can make it more attractive then VMware

Recommendations to others considering the product

With the 2016 version coming out they are really closing the gap with VMware. The features are becoming closer in sync with each other and it is gaining more market share which should help with some 3rd party appliances

What do you dislike?

I wish there were more reporting features build into the console that can be emailed. We had to setup different ways to get reports especially for Hyper-V replication.

What do you like best?

Hyper-V has a very easy deployment path and it's very easy to convert physical machines to a virtual machine.

What do you dislike?

It dosent have the tool and reporting like VMware.

What do you like best?

Its built into windows and no additional licenses are needed to run VM's.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Look into Veeam to fill in the holes of the software.

What do you dislike?

I think it doesn't quite work with large scale infrastructures. You can start with small servers. Configuration and management is very complex and takes a lot fo time as compared to alternatives. On the other side, it provides little administrative powers on the virtual machine side.

What do you like best?

We are shifting to Virtualization and HyperV makes it very easy to do that. It integrates with our current environment and have very good integrations with other Microsoft services that we use.

What do you dislike?

There are a lot of features that VMware had that you are starting to incorporate into HyperV now. I dislike how long it takes for a company as large as MS to get a working product. I'd love to be 100% Microsoft, but that is nearly impossible.

What do you like best?

The new feature that allows you to send commands that are processed directly into memory from the host server. This is huge.

What do you dislike?

We were a few versions behind the curve, still running on a 2008R2 server, so many of my dislikes no longer apply. I've been told Server 2012 added basics like being able to reclaim space on thin provisioned volumes, which was lacking in 2008. Our particular environment was a pain to set up, with lots of little pitfalls to watch out for. Like a single hanging blank space at the end of the name of a nic can cause it to fail kind of nonsense.

I can't fault Microsoft since most of the headache we had setting it up was HP's fault, and issues with the Lefthand SANs. Though to HPs credit, once you convince the first-level phone support at HP-INDIA to let you speak to a real tech they know their stuff.

What do you like best?

Everyone gravitates to Hyper-V because of one thing; cost. It's free. And to be fair, it is fully and completely capable of running a virtual environment. We ran an entire small business system on it for a number of years. It generally just worked fine, with the occasional hiccup.

Recommendations to others considering the product

If you can't afford VMware's offering, it's worth trying out.