Hyper-Vの評判・口コミ 全105件

What do you dislike?

It is still fairly new and therefore not as feature-rich as its competitors.

What do you like best?

It is built into Windows Server Operating Systems and has a very easy learning experience. It is very capable and I have not had to consider other virtualization software as a result.

Recommendations to others considering the product

If you use Windows Server Operating Systems for your business, then you might as well give Hyper-V a shot, as it is a built-in feature and enabling it is easy. There is no additional cost to your company if you already have an existing Windows Server machine onsite already. It is very easy to get a VM going and other users can easily manage them as well remotely by installing the manager. It is easy to save snapshots of the VMs and restore back into them.

Hyper-V has matured over the years and can now easily stand above other virtualization products. However, the main kicker for management is cost and since Hyper-V is less expensive than other comparable products, they will likely agree to giving it a go.

What do you dislike?

Snapshot manager/tree is not clear as to which snapshot is being used or which is being deleted.

What do you like best?

Windows managed, simple GUI, easy replication and snapshots. Easy monitoring system performance.

What do you dislike?

It's still not near the robust feature set that it's competitors are hitting. When I need a rock solid VM plan that includes fault tolerance and a V-Switch that covers hundreds of servers without a headache, I still reach to other solutions.

I also hate that I don't have the ability to properly break down control to individuals to control their specific resources within a management page without significant work. I should be able to allow people to reassign/review their assigned resources across a cluster without having to give them ease of visibility to others.

What do you like best?

For what a small business will need to accomplish with scaling down a physical onprem/hosted server farm, it's a great solution. If your end result is needing to maximize the usage of your storage space/budget with your servers, Hyper-V is a winner.

Recommendations to others considering the product

You need to review other solutions on the market before confirming Hyper-V, especially if you have more then 3 servers within a cluster. I've found management on a large scale to be troublesome.

What do you dislike?

It lacks some features that products like VMware have.

What do you like best?

Hyper-V is a great alternative to other virtualization platforms. The price is right.

What do you dislike?

Not great tools for monitoring true disk usage when using thin provisioning. When wanting to do more advanced features like putting your vms in the cloud, it's pretty ugly and they have multiple layers of software that can be very confusing... Don't even think about using the hyper-v tools when you should be using the "failover" clustering tools.

What do you like best?

To setup a simple vm it's beautiful. Configuring vlans is a breeze. Adding disk is a breeze.

Ability to interact programmatically with powershell is great!

What do you dislike?

Hyper-V have minimal management capabilities. When compared to other products like vmware, it lacks the ability to manage multiple VMs which makes the application of patches easier. It could also use load balancing features which other products support out of the box.

What do you like best?

Hyper-V is an affordable rock solid hyper-visor that is easy to use. Moving virtual machines from host to host is easy and we have done so multiple times. We have over two dozen virtual machines hosted on Hyper-V, of which half is for production use. We haven't had an outage in over three years. Great product.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Definitely one of the top contenders.

What do you dislike?

Hyper-V would be more useful if we could use Linux images as well. It works well enough for any Windows environments, however the VHD's are quite large, so make sure if you are running multiple Hyper-V environments that you have a large hard drive.

What do you like best?

The ease of creating a VM is wonderful. It allows our users to use Internet Explorer 8 because some specific software requires Internet Explorer 8 or less. The ability to have multiple virtual environments without the use of additional hardware taking up physical desk space is great. Using it with Windows 10 virtual desktops and using the CTRL-Win-arrow key shortcut makes it feel like you are using a KVM switch connected to multiple machines.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Definately useful and worth a try if you need to create a virtual environment for older software

What do you dislike?

does not support nested virtualization

slow and only works well with MS products

What do you like best?

virtual machines

checkpoints for easy switch between snapshots

Recommendations to others considering the product

use virtualbox or vmware instead

What do you dislike?

Still some overhead, but the ease of management and day to day more than makes up for it.

What do you like best?

It's built into Windows, is easy to set up and use.