Hyper-Vの評判・口コミ 全105件

What do you dislike?

Not as smooth as VMware Vcenter. But SSVMM provides enterprise level clouds management tools

What do you like best?

Hyper-V is a great solution for Microsoft AD networks. Cost is minimal. Using built in tools along with the option to setup and use replication between hosts can be a life saver.

Especially when utilizing older hardware.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Carefully plan implementation. Keep in mind replica窶冱 and library resources needed for replicating and running on additional separate hardware.

What do you dislike?

The only downfall of this software is it only available for the windows server base

What do you like best?

The best product for windows server virtualization as it allows you for multiple instances virtualized servers without interrupting the physical hardware

Recommendations to others considering the product

You should use Hyper-V for virtualization as it already built in to Windows Server and it will save a lot of money for buying the virtualization device

What do you dislike?

Graphics acceleration is fairly limited and inflexible. Remote access is harder than with some other hypervisor platforms.

What do you like best?

I like the integrated support by many guest operating systems.

What do you dislike?

Storage replication needs to be improved.

What do you like best?

Hyper-V continues to get better with each new release. The more recent feature release, nested virtualization, is quite impressive.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Consider storage replication needs brfore implementing.

What do you dislike?

Does not work with Windows 10 Home. Checkpoints can sometimes corrupt vhd. Has never happened to me, but I've seen reviews.

What do you like best?

Comes stock with Windows 10 Professional, Enterprise, and Education. Easy to use, easy to change system resource allocation. Even people that aren't "professionals" can easily spin-up their own virtual servers. If you need a very specific environment created, Hyper-V allows virtual creation with very specific options.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Evaluate all options thoroughly. If you are setting up a bare-bones server, you may want to consider ESXI. But for ease of use, it doesn't get much better.

What do you dislike?

There isn't as much to to as VMWare. VMWare is more robust and feels like a much better product.

What do you like best?

Hyper V was super easy to set up. Once I had the server ready I was literally up and going in a few hours.

Recommendations to others considering the product

I would consider VMWare if you can afford it.

What do you dislike?

The Managing multiple hosts in a cluster is a bit confusing, especially when RDPing. GUI could be a bit more intuitive. Powershell scripting within a cluster also get's confusing, or I just didn't spend enough time navigating the documentation.

What do you like best?

Hyper-V gives you the ability to scale your systems while keeping your hardware budget at a reasonable number. Running multiple VMs on as few as a single physical VM host with the ability to specify different networks for each node - the options and features really changed how infrastructure works in modern data centers.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Pull the trigger and enjoy the savings.

What do you dislike?

One of the drawbacks that I see to using a virtual platform is the inability to allocate more hard drive space on the fly. The same goes with shrinking volumes, it's not impossible, just difficult.

What do you like best?

Hyper-V comes free when you purchase Microsoft Windows Server. It's as good as VMWare in my opinion.

What do you dislike?

Initial setup can be clunky, and Microsoft's documentation, while vast, can be quite dense. Attaching physical hard disk to a VM, either internally or externally, is a lot more complicated compared to other VM solutions (specifically VMware's offerings). Compressing a virtual disk image (vhdx) can be a lesson in frustration as the compression doesn't always succeed. Support for non-Windows OS' is very weak - it will work with Linux, but drivers are weak. GPU performance for VM's is pretty awful, which leads into Hyper-V is primarily focused on hosting server OS' and is not designed for consumers in mind.

What do you like best?

Functionality is built-in to Windows Server 2012 and 2016, as well as Windows 10 Pro - so need to purchase a separate VM solution. It integrates with Windows Server Backup very nicely, making it very easy to backup a VM. Since Hyper-V functions as a server software, can manage multiple VM's hosted on multiple physical machines from a central location.

Recommendations to others considering the product

For the most part, Hyper-V meets virtualization needs. It is not as feature rich or as powerful as VMware vsphere or similar solutions, but being built directly into Windows is a major, major plus.