Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)の評判・口コミ 全64件

What do you dislike?

Sometimes the connection of the data base is slow.

What do you like best?

Easy to use for using and loading data to the cloud for business purposes.

What do you dislike?

More preset permissions should be available for admin helpers.

What do you like best?

Simple dashboard with all the features we need. Great range of regions available for risk management. Easy implementation.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Pair with Pingdom to get alerts on instance health sent to your whole team by SMS or email.

What do you dislike?

It should be a little simpler to manage permissions. Web UI needs some UX improvements, but it's getting much better over time.

What do you like best?

it's very mature, fast, secure, easy to setup and start using. Have a great CLI tool also.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Highly recommended, It's an extremely flexible virtual storage solution with fair costs.

What do you dislike?

difficult to get started using effectively, limited management functionality and file search ability from the console. where are my files?

What do you like best?

Flexible storage, pay only for what you use

Recommendations to others considering the product

It takes about 1 day of reviewing the documentation and experimenting to get started effectively. Use the Python Boto3 package.

What do you dislike?

Though there are a ton of automation potential I would like to see more automation around templating and standardizing buckets and objects. For example, if you're running a large number of websites off of S3 the ability to have a standard configuration, tagging, permissions, auditing and event setup would be great. This does exist if you create one base bucket and have the rest of the buckets match it but that is a policy that you can only apply when you initially create the resources. You cannot apply that policy to existing buckets without some effort

What do you like best?

The usability, performance, and dependability of S3. The S3 platform has more configuration features that I can use and cover almost every use case.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Consider your use cases and if you're going to have a large number of buckets try to have them standardized. Take advantage of s3 events to add more power to your system.

What do you dislike?

The interface can be a bit confusing to navigate.

What do you like best?

The ability to protect my content is my favorite part.

What do you dislike?

It can be hard to move your backup from the EC2 storage to S3 if you can't get a CRON job running.

What do you like best?

Amazon S3 is a great place to store your backups. I copy all of my systems MySQL backups to S3 storage and then have the archived to Glacier after they get more than 30 days old.

Recommendations to others considering the product

I is a good archive solution with a nice inexpensive way of real archiving (Glacier) .

What do you dislike?

There are hidden bandwidth/request costs that add up if you are making a large number of API calls or downloading large amounts of data.

What do you like best?

The web interface makes it very easy to upload/share files across EC2 servers.

Recommendations to others considering the product

S3 has a number of different storage-tier options depending on how long you plan to store your data and how frequently you need to access it. If you will be using S3 heavily and want to make sure you're not spending too much, you should do some analysis to figure out which tier will give you the most cost-efficient storage backend. In this analysis, be sure to take into account your access patterns, as S3 also charges for API calls on top of storage usage.

What do you dislike?

Reading from S3 is slow. Still better compared to other alternatives.

What do you like best?

S3 is literally the place where most of public enterprise data is stored. Being the first player in cloud segment they are the market leader. They beat hands down other products like Azure Blobs and Google FS in terms of scalability, reliability.

S3 is cheap. You only pay couple of dollars for accessing and storing a terabyte.

Solid security and integrates neatly with other AWS tools like IAM roles and users. Bucket policies ensure that bucket is only accessed by users who have proper security credentials.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Currently the best cloud storage service you can get in the market.