Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)の評判・口コミ 全64件

What do you dislike?

Though there are a ton of automation potential I would like to see more automation around templating and standardizing buckets and objects. For example, if you're running a large number of websites off of S3 the ability to have a standard configuration, tagging, permissions, auditing and event setup would be great. This does exist if you create one base bucket and have the rest of the buckets match it but that is a policy that you can only apply when you initially create the resources. You cannot apply that policy to existing buckets without some effort

What do you like best?

The usability, performance, and dependability of S3. The S3 platform has more configuration features that I can use and cover almost every use case.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Consider your use cases and if you're going to have a large number of buckets try to have them standardized. Take advantage of s3 events to add more power to your system.

What do you dislike?

difficult to get started using effectively, limited management functionality and file search ability from the console. where are my files?

What do you like best?

Flexible storage, pay only for what you use

Recommendations to others considering the product

It takes about 1 day of reviewing the documentation and experimenting to get started effectively. Use the Python Boto3 package.

What do you dislike?

It should be a little simpler to manage permissions. Web UI needs some UX improvements, but it's getting much better over time.

What do you like best?

it's very mature, fast, secure, easy to setup and start using. Have a great CLI tool also.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Highly recommended, It's an extremely flexible virtual storage solution with fair costs.

What do you dislike?

More preset permissions should be available for admin helpers.

What do you like best?

Simple dashboard with all the features we need. Great range of regions available for risk management. Easy implementation.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Pair with Pingdom to get alerts on instance health sent to your whole team by SMS or email.

What do you dislike?

Sometimes the connection of the data base is slow.

What do you like best?

Easy to use for using and loading data to the cloud for business purposes.

What do you dislike?

The Amazon S3 UI changes consistently and a lot of times is difficult to use. It takes a certain amount of expertise to operate making it new user unfriendly.

What do you like best?

Amazon S3 is an extensive system with relative ease of use that allows us to distribute app configuration to all of our users. Account access prevents users from accessing sensitive files, but still enables use of other files for testing or beta deployment. The command line support allows for massive file transfer and editing.

Recommendations to others considering the product

If you are hesitant to have a complete data backend solution for your product and would like a cheaper solution then Amazon S3 is what I would recommend that you use.

What do you dislike?

The one disadvantage to that I felt strong about S3 is that it does not allow you to specify a 窶徨oot object窶� or a default such as 窶彿ndex.html窶� to be the default file shown when someone views your S3 bucket窶冱 URL . Also, S3 does not allow for dynamic content such as PHP files to be executed, meaning that you can only store static content. For this reason, you may still need to hold onto your traditional hosting in order to execute PHP scripts & MySQL. But you could again deploy them in ECS or RDS and point to those according to your comfort.

What do you like best?

The provided options that are available for the S3 bucket objects is amazing. You might be wondering that you are actually navigating inside on folder and then further, but this is not the case. Everything on the S3 is an object itself, and the folder address we see is a virtual address for the file. If you need any jars, or any code that you want as a backup, but it needs to be deployed as well, you can keep it in the bucket and can give the URL of the file while deploying, or directly point to S3. But it is not finished yet, the most amazing part that I found was triggers. Imagine a scenario where you want an API to be called as soon as any file enters a particular folder. This happens on the S3 bucket. You can customize your trigger for events, like a file update, or delete, and then point the action to wherever you want. Call an API, maybe or call a lambda function, that is up to you.

Recommendations to others considering the product

If your project/product is bound financially, then storage on AWS S3 might be a little heavy for you to consider. Else, it will deliver above expectations.

What do you dislike?

It's good for now and I don't think needs any improvements apart from readme or introductory resources.

What do you like best?

It's best for creating clusters on cloud and easy to use. I liked the interface used to interact with S3 from windows which is just like linux terminal and all the commands are similar

Recommendations to others considering the product

Nothing

What do you dislike?

Access policy creation looks little bit difficult for me at first as it is not that user friendly

What do you like best?

Its 9 nine durability, versioning and auto archiving to Glacier

Recommendations to others considering the product

Its a very good cloud storage solution for your enterprise with great durability