Amazon Simple Storage Service (S3)の評判・口コミ 全64件

What do you dislike?

The permission set can be a bit confusing on how you should set it up

What do you like best?

I really enjoy how easy it is to learn and the tutorials.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Make it as easy as possible and make more tutorials

What do you dislike?

Although you eventually get used to it, at first, it's sort of confusing on finding a bucket URL.

What do you like best?

The way you control data; its versioning feature is amazing, as you will have "a hard time trying to lose data".

What do you dislike?

I don't like having to set access and permissions for each asset hosted on S3. I have found that it is best to organize all your assets and upload them in one big batch.

What do you like best?

I use S3 to store images and other assets that I need to serve to websites with lightening speed.

Recommendations to others considering the product

For key digital assets don't trust Wordpress or other Content Management Systems. Upload your digital assets to S3 for lightening fast load times.

What do you dislike?

Some parts are non-standard and could confuse people if they don't pay attention to detail. For example, people sometimes think that the ETag is always just the MD5 sum of the file, but actually the ETag value depends on upload method and encryption method, and may not actually be the MD5.

What do you like best?

Part of AWS, easy to use, REST API support, library support in many languages.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Use in conjunction with other services, such as Lambda, to fully leverage the file upload and store pipeline to include file processing as well.

What do you dislike?

Accessing large volumes of data can be costly if your users are far from which ever availability zone you selected to host your S3 data ... but given how cheap AWS's storage is and how little it costs to replicate this is a pretty easily solved problem.

What do you like best?

Back in the day 500MB hard disk were the size of coffee tables, weighed close to 300 lbs and cost over $20,000. These days AWS will charge you 2 cents per GB per month and you never have to worry about a dead drive again.

Oh you can also use S3 as a static store for web pages which is incredibly easy and much, much more cost effective than using either a dedicated server or a database.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Make sure you know where the primary users/accessors of the data you will be storing on S3 are and then select the availability zone accordingly. There are network charges associated with S3 data transfer; they are very low but can add-up. If, for example, your data is stored in Northern Virginia, but the primary accesses are from Europe these data access changes will b high than if the data were places in an availability zone closer to your intended users.

What do you dislike?

The price is a recurring virus. You know it's coming every month and it still burns. The control panel is counter-intuitive.

What do you like best?

It is relatively easy to setup and has been reliable. We store photos uploaded by users in S3 and videos. It is responsive and in the beginning cost effective.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Check other provides for cheaper options.

What do you dislike?

Sometimes, S3 browser doesn't work correctly.

What do you like best?

The ease of use with amazon S3 is the best thing. Customization is also one of the key point. Really useful to for debugging purposes for developers.

Recommendations to others considering the product

Absolutely, with minimum cost you get unlimited storage to use.

What do you dislike?

I've used Amazon S3 for a long time, and it's come on a long way in that time from having to access through third party clients such as Cloudberry, however, the web-interface still requires a small amount of technical knowledge. A quick to access desktop version of the web-interface would be useful for quick distribution of business files.

What do you like best?

It is so versatile, you'll find that you'll end up using it for backups, log files and also distribution of files to end consumers through a C-Name to brand the file distribution under your domain name.

What do you dislike?

Amazon S3 doesn't work great when multiple parallel request arrives to retrieve an object. There are some issues with root domain hosting using Amazon S3 to host a static website. Accessing logs and archived data is a bit tricky, but manageable. Securing files in Amazon S3 is confusing because its bucket policy is tricky to learn and implement.

What do you like best?

Amazon S3 is a simple web services interface that is be used to store and retrieve any data of your web application at cheap price. Amazon S3 is best in terms of stargaze of large objects. S3 provides ease of integration with third-party applications, always availability, Static website hosting, data security, Backup and archiving of any kind of data at nominal pricing.

Recommendations to others considering the product

I recommend Amazon S3 to all junior and senior level developers. It is Very simple and easy to use cloud based storage. Amazon S3 provides objects level and folder level security. Amazon S3 provides a Bucket concept to categorize your contents based on development , testing and production environment. Amazon S3 is the best in terms of high availability, high scalability, high security and also cost effective.